
COO in Founder-Led Companies: Why Most Fail
March 17, 2026
Boutique vs Large Executive Search Firms: Wrong Question
March 20, 2026
Why Top Sellers Fail as VP of Sales
He closed more deals than anyone in the company's history.
They promoted him to VP of Sales.
Within a year, the entire sales team was underperforming.
Not because he stopped caring. Not because management was too hard. Because the skills that made him the best seller in the building were the same skills that prevented him from leading sellers.
Here's the thing: great closers optimize for personal wins. Great sales leaders build systems that win without them.
Selling and leading sellers reward opposite instincts.
Those are different calibrations. Promoting one doesn't guarantee the other.
The Horizon Shift Nobody Explains
Great sellers operate on a Stint horizon.
This deal. This quarter. This prospect. Their feedback loop is immediate: they close, or they don't.
The VP of Sales operates on a Race horizon.
This year's pipeline. This market. This team's development. The reward is not the close. It's building a system that produces closings without the leader in the room.
That shift, from personal momentum to system design, is larger than most companies realize. It's not a step up. It's a completely different operating mode.
The newly promoted VP knows they could close the deal faster. They can see the mistakes the rep is making. The gravitational pull to jump in is almost irresistible.
And when they jump in, two things happen. First, they close the deal. Second, they teach the rep that the VP will always step in when things get difficult. The team learns to wait rather than develop. The VP learns to carry rather than build.
The Identity Crisis
This one surfaces first but gets named last.
The quota crusher's identity was built on personal performance. They knew they were good because their number told them so. Every quarter, the scoreboard confirmed their value.
As VP, the scoreboard changes. Success is measured in team quota attainment, rep retention, and pipeline health. None of these provides the immediate, personal feedback that the closer depended on.
Six months into the role, the VP feels a disorientation they can't name. They're working harder than ever and feeling less effective. The endorphin hit of the close has been replaced by the grinding ambiguity of organizational development.
That emotional vacuum drives most of the failure modes that follow.
The Failure Modes
The Peer Problem
Yesterday, they were the top rep. Today, they manage the people they used to compete with.
Former peers who resented the quota crusher's success now report to them. The social dynamics shift in ways that no title change can smooth over.
The new VP handles this by either over-asserting authority (creating resentment) or under-asserting it (creating confusion). Either path undermines team trust within the first ninety days.
The Coaching Gap
Exceptional sellers often can't articulate why they're good. They operate on instinct and pattern recognition; they've never needed to break down.
Ask the quota crusher how they close, and you'll hear: "I just know when the deal is ready." Genuine. Also useless as coaching.
The VP role requires translating personal capability into systematic development for people who don't have the same instincts. Most promoted sellers have never coached anyone. They've performed. Performance and coaching are entirely different disciplines.
The Deal Gravity Problem
The new VP can't stay out of deals.
They join calls reps should run. They rewrite proposals. They step in during negotiations.
On the surface, this looks like leadership. In reality, the VP is doing the job they were promoted from while neglecting the job they were promoted to.
Pipeline reviews don't happen. Team development stalls. Strategic planning gets pushed to "next quarter."
The VP becomes the highest-paid sales rep in the company.
The Process Avoidance
Top sellers succeed despite the process.
Now they're responsible for building it. Forecast methodology. Pipeline stages. Qualification frameworks.
Most promoted sellers either avoid the process entirely or build a process that mirrors their personal style.
Neither scales.
What Companies Should Do Instead
Test coaching ability before promotion. Give the top seller two underperforming reps to mentor. If they coach by taking over the deal, you've learned something. If they coach by diagnosing and guiding, they might be ready.
Create a senior IC path. Many quota crushers don't want to manage. They want autonomy, recognition, and bigger deals. Principal AE roles solve that without forcing leadership.
Change compensation immediately. A VP still paid as a rep will behave like a rep. Comp plans shape behavior faster than leadership training.
Train before promoting. A VP who spends their first ninety days jumping into deals has set a precedent that takes a year to undo.
What is visible as a pattern
The quota crusher promoted to VP of Sales isn't failing. They're doing exactly what made them successful. Closing deals.
The problem is that leadership requires the opposite behavior: stepping back while others close.
Most companies assume great sellers become great leaders. The evidence says otherwise.
Great sellers close deals. Great sales leaders build machines that close deals.
Those are different calibrations. And the search for a VP of Sales should test for the second before assuming the first predicts it.
Charlie Solórzano is a Managing Partner at Alder Koten, advising founders and boards on cross-border leadership transitions across the U.S. and Mexico, utilizing his proprietary methodology: “The Race Conditions Model ™. “
Considering a VP of Sales Promotion?
A 30-minute conversation to diagnose whether your top seller is calibrated for leadership — or whether an external search is the better path.
Schedule a Confidential ConsultationFrequently Asked Questions
Why do top sellers fail as VP of Sales?
The skills that make someone the best seller are the same skills that prevent them from leading sellers. Great closers optimize for personal wins. Great sales leaders build systems that win without them. Selling and leading sellers reward opposite instincts — they're different calibrations. Promoting one doesn't guarantee the other.
What is the horizon shift from seller to VP of Sales?
Great sellers operate on a Stint horizon — this deal, this quarter, this prospect. The VP of Sales operates on a Race horizon — this year's pipeline, this market, this team's development. The reward is not the close. It's building a system that produces closes without the leader in the room. That shift from personal momentum to system design is larger than most companies realize.
What is the deal gravity problem?
The new VP can't stay out of deals. They join calls reps should run, rewrite proposals, step in during negotiations. On the surface this looks like leadership. In reality the VP is doing the job they were promoted from while neglecting the job they were promoted to. Pipeline reviews don't happen. Team development stalls. The VP becomes the highest-paid sales rep in the company.
How do you test if a top seller is ready for VP of Sales?
Give the top seller two underperforming reps to mentor for a quarter. Don't change their title or comp. If they coach by taking over deals, you've learned something — they'll do the same as VP. If they coach by diagnosing and guiding without doing the work themselves, they might be ready for the horizon shift.
Should you create a senior individual contributor path for top sellers?
Yes. Many quota crushers don't actually want to manage. They want autonomy, recognition, and bigger deals. A Principal Account Executive or Senior Enterprise Seller role provides all three without forcing someone into leadership who would rather be selling. The assumption that the only career path goes through management is an organizational design failure.
Why does VP of Sales compensation matter so much?
A VP still paid like a rep will behave like a rep. If compensation is weighted toward personal deal commission, the VP will keep closing deals instead of building the team. Comp plans shape behavior faster than leadership training. Move the VP to team-based metrics on day one.



