Startup Executive Search | CTO, CPO, CFO, CRO & CMO - Mexico & U.S.

INTRODUCTION

Mexico's startup ecosystem has exploded over the past five years—fintech, SaaS, e-commerce, logistics tech, B2B infrastructure, and consumer platforms are attracting unprecedented venture capital and talent. Yet finding executive leaders who can navigate regulatory complexity, build scalable technology, manage hypergrowth, and operate across U.S.-Mexico markets remains one of the most critical challenges facing founders and boards.

Here's the problem: Most executive search firms treat startup leadership like corporate hiring with faster timelines. They'll send you a parade of candidates with impressive-sounding titles—CTOs from enterprise software companies, CPOs from mature consumer apps, CFOs from traditional corporations, growth marketers from agencies. But do they understand what it takes to scale from 10 to 100 to 1,000 employees in 24 months? Can they build technology infrastructure with limited resources while maintaining enterprise-grade reliability? Can they navigate the chaos of product-market fit while building institutional discipline? Do they thrive in environments where the playbook hasn't been written yet?

Probably not.

Startup executive search isn't about finding someone with "startup experience" on their resume. It's about identifying rare hybrid leaders who can operate at startup velocity while building the systems, processes, and teams that enable sustainable scale. It's about finding executives who thrive in the tension between "move fast and ship" and "build foundations that won't collapse under growth."

That's the expertise I bring. Two decades navigating Mexico's tech ecosystem and cross-border startup markets, building executive teams for companies that went from seed stage to market leaders, and understanding exactly what separates executives who scale from those who flame out when growth accelerates.

Whether you're building fintech, SaaS, marketplace platforms, B2B infrastructure, or consumer tech, the leadership challenges are fundamentally similar. You need executives who've been there before, who know what breaks at each stage, and who can execute in both the U.S. and Mexico markets.

 

WHY STARTUP EXECUTIVE SEARCH IS DIFFERENT

The Dual Capability Requirement

Startup leadership demands a combination that's rarer than you think: domain expertise in your industry + modern technology or growth capabilities + the psychological makeup to thrive in high-uncertainty environments.

A traditional enterprise CTO from a Fortune 500 company might be brilliant at managing large engineering organizations, but they're often institutionalized into slow, process-heavy decision-making. They're accustomed to unlimited budgets, 18-month roadmaps, and saying "no" as the default response to risk.

Conversely, a scrappy engineer from a seed-stage startup might thrive in chaos but lacks the experience to build systems that scale to 100+ engineers or architect infrastructure that handles millions of users.

The startup executive sweet spot? Leaders who've lived in both worlds. They've operated with startup constraints and velocity, but they've also scaled something—they know what "good" looks like at Series A, Series B, and beyond. They understand that speed and discipline aren't opposing forces; they're complementary capabilities that separate companies that scale from those that stall.

Stage-Specific Expertise Matters

Startup executives face radically different challenges depending on stage:

Seed Stage (Finding Product-Market Fit): You need scrappy builders who can ship fast with minimal resources, pivot based on customer feedback, and wear multiple hats. Titles don't matter yet—you need problem-solvers.

Series A (Scaling What Works): You need executives who can take your initial traction and build repeatable systems around it. How do we hire 20 engineers without quality collapsing? How do we scale customer acquisition profitably? How do we build financial infrastructure for venture-scale growth?

Series B-C (Building Institutional Capability): You need leaders who've managed through hypergrowth. They've scaled organizations from 50 to 250+ people. They've built processes that enable coordination without killing agility. They've navigated the transition from "everyone knows everything" to "we need actual systems."

Growth Stage (Optimizing for Efficiency): You need operators who can drive profitability, optimize unit economics, build sustainable competitive moats, and potentially prepare for exit (acquisition or IPO).

Most executive search firms don't understand these stage-specific requirements. They'll send you Series C candidates when you need Series A capabilities, or scrappy founders when you need institutional operators.

I map candidates to your actual stage-specific needs, not just generic "startup experience."

Cross-Border Complexity

If you're scaling between the United States and Mexico—or targeting both markets—leadership complexity multiplies exponentially.

Regulatory environments differ: What works in U.S. markets often faces different regulations in Mexico (data privacy, labor law, industry-specific licensing). Your executives must navigate both, not learn on your dime.

Talent strategies diverge: Hiring engineers in Mexico City requires different compensation structures, cultural understanding, and retention strategies than hiring in San Francisco. Building distributed teams across borders requires leaders who've done it before.

Go-to-market approaches vary: B2B sales cycles, consumer behavior, payment preferences, distribution channels, trust-building mechanisms—all different between the U.S. and Mexico markets. Your executives need bi-cultural fluency, not just bilingual capability.

Investor expectations differ: U.S. venture capital and Mexican venture capital evaluate startups differently. Metrics that matter to Andreessen Horowitz may differ from those that matter to ALLVP, Jaguar Ventures, or FEMSA Ventures. Leaders who've navigated both ecosystems can communicate effectively with diverse investor bases.

You need executives who've already operated across both markets—not ones who'll figure it out as they go.

Not Sure Which Executives You Need First?

Let's map your stage-specific hiring roadmap—no obligation, just strategic insight.

Get Your Hiring Roadmap

CRITICAL STARTUP & SCALE-UP EXECUTIVE ROLES

Chief Technology Officer (CTO)

What the Role Actually Requires:

Your CTO isn't just an engineering leader—they're the architect of your technical competitive advantage, the builder of your product velocity, and often the executor who turns vision into working software.

In early-stage startups, the CTO is often still writing code. In growth-stage companies, they're building engineering organizations, defining technical architecture, and making build-vs-buy decisions that determine whether you scale efficiently or accumulate crushing technical debt.

They own:

  • Technology strategy and architecture that balances speed to market with long-term scalability
  • Engineering team building in brutally competitive talent markets
  • Product development velocity without sacrificing quality or creating unsustainable technical debt
  • Infrastructure and operations that ensure reliability, security, and performance at scale
  • Technical debt management that enables speed today while not crippling you tomorrow
  • Vendor and tool strategy (cloud providers, dev tools, third-party APIs, build vs. buy decisions)
  • Security and compliance appropriate to your industry (especially critical for fintech, healthcare, and financial services)

Typical Background:

The strongest startup CTOs usually come from one of three paths:

  1. Startup/Scale-Up Engineering Leaders: They've been through hypergrowth at another startup, scaled engineering from 5 to 50+ engineers, and know what breaks at each stage.

  2. Big Tech → Startup: Senior engineers or engineering managers from Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft who've decided to trade stability for equity and impact. They bring world-class engineering practices but must adapt to resource-constrained environments.

  3. Technical Founders Who Professionalized: Founders who successfully transitioned from "scrappy hacker" to "strategic engineering leader." They understand the startup context deeply, but had to develop organizational leadership capabilities.

Key Competencies:

Hands-on technical excellence (can still review code, debug production issues, make architecture decisions)
Scalable architecture design (knows when to build for scale vs. when to take shortcuts strategically)
Engineering team building (hiring, retention, culture, career development in competitive markets)
Product partnership (collaborates with Chief Product Officer/CEO to translate vision into technical execution)
Speed + discipline balance (ships fast but doesn't create unsustainable technical debt)
Cross-functional communication (explains technical decisions to non-technical stakeholders)
Modern tech stack fluency (cloud-native, APIs, microservices, DevOps, CI/CD)

What Makes Startup CTO Leadership Different:

Resource Constraints: Startup CTOs must build world-class products with 1/10th the budget and 1/5th the engineering headcount of enterprise companies. They make strategic trade-offs constantly—what to build in-house vs. what to buy, when to scale infrastructure vs. when to "make it work for now."

Velocity Pressure: In startups, shipping speed often determines survival. Your CTO must balance "perfect is the enemy of good" with "cutting corners that will kill us later." This judgment—knowing when to move fast and when to slow down—separates great startup CTOs from mediocre ones.

Talent Competition: Top engineers have multiple offers. Your CTO must build compelling engineering culture, sell vision, and create environments where world-class engineers want to work—often despite paying below big tech compensation.

Ambiguity and Pivots: Startups pivot. Requirements change. The product you're building in Q1 might be completely different by Q4. Your CTO must architect systems with flexibility, not rigid perfection.

Red Flags:

✗ Only worked at large, mature tech companies (can't operate with startup constraints)
✗ Only worked at early-stage startups (lacks experience scaling past 50 engineers)
✗ Dismissive of process and discipline (confuses "move fast" with "no systems")
✗ Can't recruit or retain engineers (loses talent wars to better-funded competitors)
✗ Over-architects solutions (builds for scale you won't reach for 3 years, wastes time/money)

 

Chief Product Officer (CPO)

What the Role Actually Requires:

In startups, your Chief Product Officer is the strategist who defines what you're building, for whom, and why. They're the bridge between customer needs, business strategy, and technical feasibility.

Early-stage CPOs often function as "product athlete"—running customer interviews, writing specs, designing interfaces, analyzing data, and making prioritization decisions daily. Growth-stage CPOs become organizational leaders, building product teams and frameworks that enable multiple product managers to execute independently.

They own:

  • Product vision and strategy aligned with business goals and market opportunity
  • Product roadmap and prioritization (ruthless focus on what matters most)
  • Customer research and insight (understanding customer problems deeply, not just feature requests)
  • Product-market fit discovery (for early-stage) or expansion (for growth-stage)
  • Go-to-market strategy for product launches
  • Product team building and enablement (hiring PMs, designers, researchers)
  • Cross-functional orchestration between engineering, design, marketing, sales, and support
  • Metrics and analytics that measure product success and inform decisions

Typical Background:

The strongest startup CPOs usually emerge from:

  1. Product Leaders from Successful Startups: They've taken products from 0→1 (product-market fit) or 1→10 (scale), navigated pivots, and launched features that drove real business outcomes.

  2. Consumer or B2B Tech PMs Who Leveled Up: Product managers from high-growth tech companies (Uber, Airbnb, Stripe, Shopify, Atlassian) who've moved into leadership roles and want more ownership.

  3. Founders Who Specialized in Product: Ex-founders who discovered their superpower was product intuition and customer insight, now applying that to scale-ups.

  4. Management Consultants → Product Leaders: Strategy consultants (McKinsey, Bain, BCG) who transitioned into product roles and developed execution capabilities beyond frameworks.

Key Competencies:

Customer empathy and research (talks to customers constantly, doesn't just read reports)
Strategic prioritization (says "no" to 90% of ideas to focus on the 10% that matter)
Product-market fit intuition (knows when you have it vs. when you're fooling yourself)
Data-driven decision making (uses quantitative and qualitative data, not just gut feel)
Cross-functional leadership (influences without authority, orchestrates teams)
Design partnership (collaborates with designers to create exceptional experiences)
Technical fluency (understands engineering trade-offs, speaks credibly with CTOs)
Business acumen (connects product decisions to revenue, retention, profitability)

What Makes Startup CPO Leadership Different:

High Uncertainty: In startups, you often don't know what product to build yet. Your CPO must excel at discovery, experimentation, and learning—not just executing against a known roadmap.

Resource Scarcity: You have five engineers, not 500. Your CPO must ruthlessly prioritize, aggressively cut scope, and find creative solutions that deliver customer value with minimal engineering investment.

Speed Matters: In competitive markets, shipping speed determines winners. Your CPO must balance "ship fast to learn" with "ship quality to build trust." They embrace iteration over perfection.

Founder Dynamics: In many startups, the founder still has strong product opinions (sometimes they were the original product leader). Your CPO must navigate this dynamic—partnering with founders, influencing respectfully, sometimes disagreeing productively.

Red Flags:

✗ No startup or early-stage experience (expects enterprise resources and processes)
✗ Feature factory mentality (ships features without business outcomes)
✗ Can't articulate product strategy beyond "we need to listen to customers."
✗ Dismissive of engineering constraints (doesn't understand technical trade-offs)
✗ Only worked on one product (lacks pattern recognition across different contexts)






Chief Risk Officer (CRO) - Risk Management

[Note to reader: This section is most relevant for fintech, financial services, heavily regulated startups, or companies handling sensitive data/payments. For pure SaaS/B2B startups, this role often doesn't exist until later stages.]

What the Role Actually Requires:

Let's be clear: most startups don't need a Chief Risk Officer initially. But if you're in fintech, financial services, healthcare, crypto, payments, lending, insurance, or any business where regulatory compliance and risk management are mission-critical—this role becomes existential.

Your Chief Risk Officer is your company's immune system. They scan for threats, mitigate disasters before they happen, ensure operations remain robust under regulatory scrutiny, and help you innovate responsibly without blowing up.

They own:

  • Enterprise risk management across operational, financial, regulatory, cybersecurity, and reputational risk
  • Regulatory compliance strategy and execution (industry-specific regulations)
  • Fraud detection and prevention (especially for fintech, payments, and marketplace platforms)
  • Cybersecurity and data privacy (GDPR, CCPA, Mexico's data protection law)
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery planning
  • Vendor and third-party risk management
  • Internal controls and audit readiness
  • Risk culture (making risk management everyone's responsibility, not just compliance)

Typical Background:

Exceptional startup CROs are rare hybrids:

  1. Risk Leaders from Startups/Scale-Ups: They've built risk functions from scratch at other high-growth companies, know what breaks at each stage, and have relationships with regulators.

  2. Traditional Finance/Banking Risk Leaders Who Modernized: They come from banks, insurance, or payment processors, but led digital transformation and understand modern risk management technology.

  3. Risk + Data Science Hybrids: Quantitative leaders who combine risk domain expertise with machine learning, statistical modeling, and data infrastructure.

 

Key Competencies:

Tech-fluent (speaks the language of developers, can evaluate ML-driven risk models)
Business-minded (enables innovation by finding risk/reward balance, not just saying "no")
Regulatory-savvy (has navigated industry-specific regulators, understands compliance requirements)
Data-driven (builds risk models, not just risk policies)
Communication (translates risk into business language for CEOs and boards)
Pragmatic (balances startup speed with responsible risk management)

Red Flags:

"Dinosaur" CRO: From legacy finance, risk-averse to the point of paralysis
Compliance Checkbox CRO: Sees role as ticking regulatory boxes, not building proactive risk culture
One-Trick Pony CRO: Deep expertise in one risk area (cyber or credit) but lacks strategic breadth
Ivory Tower CRO: Brilliant theoretically, but can't operate in resource-constrained environments

When to Hire:

Most startups don't hire a Chief Risk Officer until Series B+ or when regulatory requirements demand it. Earlier-stage companies often combine risk functions under the CFO, General Counsel, or VP Operations.

Chief Revenue Officer (CRO) - Revenue Engine

What the Role Actually Requires:

Let's clear up the alphabet soup: in startups, you might hear about two different CROs—Chief Risk Officer (risk management, mostly relevant for regulated industries) and Chief Revenue Officer (revenue/sales engine, appropriate for nearly every startup).

This section is about the Chief Revenue Officer—the executive who owns your entire revenue engine.

Your Chief Revenue Officer owns everything related to generating revenue: sales strategy, customer acquisition, partnerships, channel development, pricing, and go-to-market execution. They're the person responsible for turning your product into predictable, scalable revenue.

They own:

  • Revenue strategy and forecasting across all channels
  • Sales team building and enablement (hiring, training, comp structure, tools, process)
  • Go-to-market strategy for new products, features, and markets
  • Partnership and channel development (resellers, integrations, distribution partners)
  • Pricing and packaging that balances customer value, market positioning, and profitability
  • Customer acquisition cost (CAC) optimization while maintaining growth velocity
  • Revenue operations (CRM, sales analytics, pipeline management, forecasting accuracy)
  • Customer success and retention (in some organizations, it depends on structure)

Typical Background:

The strongest startup Chief Revenue Officers usually come from:

  1. Sales Leaders from High-Growth Startups: Revenue or sales executives who've scaled ARR from $0 to $10M+ or $10M to $50M+. They've built sales teams from scratch and know what works.

  2. Enterprise Sales Executives Who Joined Startups: Top-performing sales leaders from big tech (Salesforce, Oracle, Microsoft, AWS) who've moved to startups and adapted their enterprise sales expertise to resource-constrained environments.

  3. Business Development Leaders Who Evolved: Partnership or BD executives who proved they could not just close deals but build repeatable revenue engines.

  4. Founders Who Specialized in GTM: Ex-founders who discovered their superpower was go-to-market execution, now applying that to other startups.

Key Competencies:

B2B or B2C sales expertise, depending on your business model
Sales team building (hiring A-players, creating comp plans, building high-performance culture)
Pipeline management and forecasting (accurate revenue predictions, data-driven pipeline analysis)
Partnership development (most startups can't scale through direct sales alone)
Cross-functional collaboration (works closely with product, marketing, and customer success)
Unit economics discipline (CAC, LTV, payback period, win rates, deal velocity)
Modern sales tech fluency (CRM, sales engagement platforms, analytics tools)
International/cross-border sales (if operating in the U.S. and Mexico markets)




What Makes Startup Revenue Leadership Different:

Building vs. Managing: Enterprise CROs often inherit established sales processes. Startup CROs must build the playbook from scratch—what's our ICP? What's our sales process? How do we comp reps? What tools do we need?

Founder Selling → Team Selling: Early startups rely on founder-led sales. Your CRO must transition from "founders close everything" to "repeatable sales process that scales beyond founders."

Resource Constraints: You can't hire 50 SDRs and throw budget at the problem. Your CRO must find creative, capital-efficient ways to generate pipeline and close deals.

Market Education: In many startups, you're selling something new that customers don't yet know they need. Your CRO must excel at market education, not just demand capture.

Red Flags:

✗ Only enterprise sales experience (expects unlimited budget, large teams, established brand)
✗ "Spray and pray" mentality (no discipline around ICP, qualification, pipeline management)
✗ Can't recruit or retain sales talent (loses A-players to competitors)
✗ Doesn't understand your product or customer (pure "numbers person" without strategic insight)
✗ No experience building a sales process from scratch (only managed existing teams)

 

Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

What the Role Actually Requires:

In startups, the CFO isn't just "the accountant who went to business school." They're the strategic financial partner who ensures you don't run out of money, the investor relations lead who secures your next round, the unit economics guardian who keeps growth sustainable, and the voice of financial discipline that balances founder ambition with reality.

A startup CFO operates at the intersection of finance, strategy, fundraising, and operational execution. They're translating your business model into financial narratives that investors understand while ensuring you have the runway to execute your vision.

They own:

  • Financial planning and analysis (FP&A)—forecasting, budgeting, scenario modeling, runway management
  • Fundraising and investor relations—leading funding rounds, managing investor communication
  • Unit economics and path to profitability—CAC/LTV ratios, contribution margins, burn rate optimization
  • Financial operations—accounting, treasury, payroll, tax compliance, audit management
  • Strategic finance—M&A evaluation, pricing strategy, business model optimization
  • Board reporting and governance—financial reporting to the board, audit committee management
  • Risk management and controls—internal controls, fraud prevention (financial side), compliance

Typical Background:

The strongest startup CFOs usually emerge from:

  1. Startup Finance Veterans: CFOs or finance leaders from other startups who've scaled companies through multiple funding rounds, know how to manage hypergrowth burn rates, and speak fluent VC.

  2. Big 4 → Startup CFO: Former partners or senior managers from Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG who transitioned into operating roles. They bring financial rigor but need to adapt to startup velocity and ambiguity.

  3. Investment Banking → Operating CFO: Former investment bankers who moved into CFO roles. They excel at fundraising and financial storytelling, but must develop operational finance muscle.

  4. Private Equity / Venture Capital → Operating CFO: Investors who decided to join the operating side. They understand investor expectations intimately but need to develop day-to-day finance operations capabilities.

Key Competencies:

Venture capital fluency—speaks the language of investors, understands term sheets, valuation dynamics, and cap table management
Financial modeling excellence—builds sophisticated models for unit economics, runway scenarios, profitability paths
Fundraising experience—has led or participated in venture capital raises (ideally $5M+ rounds)
Strategic thinking—not just reporting what happened, but advising on what should happen next
Operational finance—doesn't just strategize, can actually implement accounting systems and financial processes
Cross-border finance complexity—if operating in the U.S. and Mexico, manages multi-currency, multi-entity, transfer pricing, cross-border tax
Audit and controls—builds financial infrastructure that scales and satisfies investors/auditors
Communication—translates financial complexity into clear narratives for boards and executives

What Makes Startup CFO Leadership Different:

Fundraising Is Core to the Role: Unlike corporate CFOs, startup CFOs spend significant time raising capital—building investor decks, running fundraising processes, negotiating term sheets. This is often 30-50% of their job.

Limited Runway Focus: Startup CFOs obsess over burn rate and runway. They're constantly modeling "if we spend X per month, how long until we run out of money?" This discipline keeps startups alive.

Unit Economics Precision: Investors scrutinize startup unit economics intensely. Your CFO must model CAC, LTV, payback periods, cohort retention, and contribution margins with precision—not approximations.

Building Infrastructure From Scratch: Enterprise CFOs inherit finance teams and systems. Startup CFOs build from zero—selecting accounting software, hiring first finance hires, creating processes that scale.

Red Flags:

✗ Only worked in profitable, mature companies (can't operate with startup constraints)
✗ No fundraising experience (critical skill for venture-backed startups)
✗ Purely operational focus (needs strategic capabilities and investor fluency)
✗ Risk-averse to the point of paralysis (startups require calculated risk-taking)
✗ Can't communicate with non-finance executives (becomes "the person who always says no")

When to Hire:

Pre-Seed/Seed (< $2M raised): You don't need a full-time CFO. Founders manage finances, outsource bookkeeping.

Series A ($2M-$10M raised): Hire a Controller or VP Finance who can grow into the CFO role, or bring in an experienced CFO if planning aggressive growth.

Series B+ ($10M+): You need a real CFO. Investor expectations increase, financial complexity grows, and the next fundraise becomes critical.

Exception: If you're in a complex business (marketplace with multi-sided unit economics, fintech with balance sheet risk), hire a CFO earlier.

 

Chief People Officer (CPO) / Chief Human Resources Officer (CHRO)

What the Role Actually Requires:

Most startups treat "people functions" as administrative overhead until something breaks—key executives quit, team culture fractures, you realize your best engineers are burned out and interviewing elsewhere, or a harassment claim surfaces with no HR infrastructure to handle it.

By then, it will be expensive to fix.

A Chief People Officer or CHRO isn't just "HR." In high-growth startups, they're the architect of organizational capability, culture, and competitive advantage through talent. They're the executive who ensures you can attract exceptional people, develop them into leaders, and retain them as you scale.

They own:

  • Talent strategy—how you attract, hire, develop, and retain people in brutally competitive markets
  • Organizational design—structure, roles, reporting relationships that enable (or constrain) execution
  • Culture and values—not bullshit posters, but the actual behaviors you reward and tolerate
  • Leadership development—ensuring first-time managers can actually manage and executives can lead at scale
  • Compensation and equity strategy—keeping offers competitive while managing dilution and cash constraints
  • Employee experience—onboarding, engagement, retention programs, remote/hybrid work strategy
  • People operations—payroll, benefits, compliance, HR systems, employment law
  • Performance management—how you evaluate, promote, and (when necessary) exit people
  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion—not as checkbox compliance but as a competitive advantage

Typical Background:

The strongest startup CPOs/CHROs usually come from:

  1. Startup/Scale-Up People Leaders: HR executives who've built people functions from scratch at other high-growth companies, navigated rapid scaling (50 → 500 employees), cultural transitions, and competitive talent wars.

  2. Big Tech HR Leaders: People executives from Google, Amazon, Facebook, Netflix, Microsoft who've decided to trade stability for impact. They bring world-class people practices but must adapt to resource constraints.

  3. Management Consulting → Operating CHRO: Strategy consultants who specialized in org design or people strategy and transitioned to operating roles. They excel at strategic thinking but need to develop HR operational capabilities.

  4. Startup Operators Who Specialized in People: Operations leaders or Chief of Staff executives who discovered their strength was building teams and culture, then formalized it into people leadership.

Key Competencies:

Strategic business partner—sits at leadership table, influences business strategy, not just executes HR tasks
Talent market intelligence—knows where top talent comes from in your industry, what they care about, how to compete for them
Organizational design expertise—structures teams for execution, not just draws org charts
Culture architect—defines and reinforces culture through hiring, promotions, performance management, not just values posters
Compensation strategy—balances cash constraints, equity management, and market competitiveness
Leadership coaching—develops first-time managers and helps executives scale their capabilities
Data-driven—uses metrics (attrition, time-to-hire, engagement, performance distribution) to drive decisions
Employment law fluency—navigates Mexican labor law (Ley Federal del Trabajo) and U.S. employment regulations
Cross-border HR—if operating in both the U.S. and Mexico, manages different labor laws, cultural norms, and benefits structures

What Makes Startup People Leadership Different:

Hyper-Competitive Talent Markets: Startup engineers, product managers, and executives have multiple competing offers simultaneously. Your people strategy must be elite-level, or you lose talent wars to better-funded competitors.

Rapid Scaling Breaks Everything: Growing from 50 to 200 employees in 12 months breaks all processes. Your CPO must build scalable systems while maintaining the culture that made you special in the first place.

Resource Constraints: You can't just throw money at compensation. Your CPO must create compelling employee experiences with a limited budget—through culture, growth opportunities, equity stories, and mission.

Founder Dynamics: In startups, founders often maintain substantial influence over culture and hiring. Your CPO must partner with founders, preserve what's working, and professionalize what's broken—without alienating the founders.

Red Flags:

✗ Purely administrative HR background (order-taker, not strategic leader)
✗ Only worked in stable, mature companies (can't navigate rapid growth chaos)
✗ Rigid, process-heavy approach (kills startup agility and culture)
✗ Can't articulate the business impact of people decisions (sees HR as a cost center, not a competitive advantage)
✗ No experience in competitive talent markets (won't know how to win talent wars)

When to Hire:

Pre-Seed/Seed (< 25 people): Founders handle people decisions. Outsource payroll/benefits.

Series A (25-75 people): Hire your first dedicated people leader—"Head of People" or "VP People"—who builds foundational HR infrastructure.

Series B+ (75+ people): Upgrade to a true CPO/CHRO who can scale the organization to 200-500+ employees. This person should have "been there before."

Exception: If scaling extremely fast (doubling headcount every 6 months) or operating across borders, hire people leadership earlier.

Finding Executives Who Can Actually Scale Your Startup

Most search firms send resumes. I map stage-specific competencies, assess cultural fit, and find leaders who've successfully navigated your exact challenges before.

Discuss Your Executive Hiring Needs

Confidential consultation • No obligation • 20+ years experience

Head of Growth / Chief Marketing Officer (CMO)

What the Role Actually Requires:

Here's the reality most founders don't understand: marketing and growth aren't the same thing. Marketing is brand, positioning, content, and communications. Growth is systematic, data-driven customer acquisition, activation, retention, and referral.

Most early-stage startups need a Head of Growth, not a CMO. Later-stage startups need both.

A Head of Growth or CMO builds the engine that acquires customers profitably, retains them effectively, and ideally turns them into advocates who drive organic growth. In startups—whether B2B SaaS, consumer apps, marketplaces, or fintech—this role is mission-critical because distribution is often more complex than the product itself.

They own:

  • Growth strategy and execution—full-funnel optimization from awareness to activation to retention to referral
  • Customer acquisition—paid channels (Facebook, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn), organic channels (SEO, content, community), partnerships, viral/referral mechanics
  • Brand positioning and messaging—how you differentiate in crowded markets and build trust
  • Product-led growth—designing product experiences that drive acquisition and retention (especially relevant for SaaS, PLG companies)
  • Marketing operations—analytics, attribution modeling, experimentation infrastructure, martech stack
  • Content and community—educational content, thought leadership, user communities
  • Lifecycle marketing—onboarding, engagement, retention, reactivation, winback campaigns
  • Cross-border GTM execution—if operating in both the U.S. and Mexico, localizing strategy for each market

Typical Background:

The strongest startup Growth/CMO leaders usually come from:

  1. Growth Leaders from Successful Startups: Heads of Growth or CMOs who've scaled customer acquisition at other high-growth startups. They've built growth engines from scratch and know what works.

  2. Consumer Tech Growth Experts: Growth leaders from high-velocity consumer companies (Uber, DoorDash, Duolingo, Tinder, Airbnb) who understand performance marketing, viral loops, and retention psychology.

  3. Product-Led Growth Specialists: Growth PMs or marketers from PLG companies (Dropbox, Slack, Notion, Figma) who understand how to design products that market themselves.

  4. Performance Marketing Leaders: Marketing executives from direct-to-consumer brands, e-commerce, or mobile apps who've mastered paid acquisition and conversion optimization.

  5. B2B SaaS Marketing Leaders: Demand gen or growth marketing leaders from B2B SaaS companies who've built scalable lead generation and conversion engines.

Key Competencies:

Data-driven experimentation—builds testing culture, understands statistical significance, moves fast based on data
Full-funnel optimization—not just top-of-funnel, but activation, retention, monetization, referral
Performance marketing mastery—Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, TikTok, programmatic, affiliate marketing
Organic growth expertise—SEO, content marketing, community building, viral mechanics, referral programs
Brand strategy—positions the company to build trust and differentiation
Product-growth collaboration—works with the product team to design growth into the experience
Unit economics discipline—obsessed with CAC, LTV, payback period, contribution margin
Cross-border marketing—if U.S.-Mexico, understands cultural differences in messaging, channels, and trust-building
Creative and analytical—combines data science rigor with storytelling and brand intuition

What Makes Startup Growth Leadership Different:

High CAC Markets: Acquiring customers is expensive. Competition for attention is fierce. Your growth leader must achieve efficient CAC while accepting that startups will never acquire customers as cheaply as viral social apps.

Product-Market Fit Dependency: No amount of growth genius can overcome a lack of product-market fit. Your growth leader must know the difference between "we haven't found the right channels" and "our product doesn't retain users."

Resource Constraints: You can't just spend $10M on brand campaigns. Your growth leader must find scrappy, creative, capital-efficient ways to acquire customers—often through channels competitors ignore.

Speed of Learning: In startups, you need to test 10 channels fast to find the 2 that work. Your growth leader must embrace rapid experimentation and be comfortable with 80% of experiments failing.

Red Flags:

Purely brand-focused CMO—can't articulate CAC/LTV, performance metrics, or growth loops.
Growth hacker with no strategic thinking—runs tactics without understanding customer psychology or positioning.
Only worked in well-funded companies—expects unlimited budget, can't operate scrappily.
Can't operate with limited resources—wants to "build brand" before proving acquisition efficiency.
No experience in competitive markets—hasn't faced $50+ CACs or fought for customer attention

Strategic Difference: Head of Growth vs. CMO

Head of Growth:

  • More common at early-stage (Seed to Series A)
  • Performance-oriented, data-driven, scrappy
  • Focus: Rapid experimentation, efficient customer acquisition, retention optimization
  • Typical background: Growth PM, performance marketer, data scientist turned growth leader
  • Reports to: CEO or Chief Revenue Officer

Chief Marketing Officer (CMO):

  • More common at growth-stage (Series B+)
  • Strategic, brand-building, omnichannel
  • Focus: Brand positioning, integrated campaigns, market expansion, team building
  • Typical background: Marketing executive with startup or high-growth experience
  • Reports to: CEO

When to Hire:

Pre-Seed/Seed (PMF Phase): Don't hire a full-time growth leader yet. Founders drive initial growth through manual tactics. Use fractional advisors for channel experiments.

Series A ($3M-$10M raised): Hire Head of Growth or VP Growth Marketing who builds a foundational growth engine.

Series B+ ($10M+): Elevate to CMO or hire CMO if Head of Growth lacks strategic/leadership capabilities.

WHEN TO HIRE EACH EXECUTIVE ROLE: STAGE-BY-STAGE GUIDE

Seed Stage (< $2M raised, < 25 people, Finding Product-Market Fit)

Who You Need:

  • Founders + small team of builders (engineers, designers, early PMs)
  • Outsourced finance/HR (bookkeeper, PEO for payroll)

Don't hire yet: CFO, CPO/CHRO, CMO, Chief Revenue Officer

Exception: If building in a highly technical domain, consider a fractional CTO advisor. If in a regulated industry, consider a fractional compliance/risk advisor.

Series A ($2M-$10M raised, 25-75 people, Scaling What Works)

Who You Need:

  • CTO (if not already hired or if founder-CTO needs to transition)
  • Head of Growth or VP Marketing (building growth engine)
  • VP Sales or early Chief Revenue Officer (if B2B, building sales team)
  • Controller or VP Finance (financial infrastructure, preparing for next raise)
  • Head of People (foundational HR, culture, recruiting)

CPO role: Probably not a full executive yet, more of an operational product manager or founding PM

When Series A fails: Companies that skip these hires and try to scale with only founders often hit walls around 50 people.

Series B ($10M-$30M raised, 75-200 people, Building Institutional Capability)

Who You Need:

  • Complete or nearly-complete C-suite
  • CFO (critical for next fundraise, investor relations, financial discipline)
  • Chief Revenue Officer (if B2B) or CMO (if consumer/PLG)
  • CPO (Chief Product Officer, leading product org)
  • CPO/CHRO (Chief People Officer, scaling organizational capability)
  • CTO (if not hired, this is the last chance before scaling chaos)

CRO (risk): If in a regulated industry (fintech, healthcare, payments), hire now

Series C+ ($30M+, 200-500+ people, Optimizing for Efficiency and Potential Exit)

Who You Need:

  • Whole executive team + specialized roles
  • All C-suite roles above
  • Chief Compliance Officer (if regulated)
  • Chief Information Security Officer (if handling sensitive data)
  • VP Revenue Operations (if not part of CRO scope)

VP People Operations (if not part of CPO scope)

THE STARTUP TALENT LANDSCAPE IN MEXICO AND THE U.S.

Where Startup Executive Talent Comes From

The startup executive talent pool in Mexico and the U.S. draws from five primary sources:

  1. Startup Alumni Networks

Leaders from successful startups (exits, IPOs, growth-stage companies) are the most sought-after executives. In Mexico: Clip, Kavak, Konfío, Bitso, Clara, Nowports. In the U.S.: Stripe, Uber, Airbnb, DoorDash, Robinhood, Coinbase, and former FAANG employees who moved to startups.

These executives have "been there before"—they've navigated hypergrowth, built teams, faced the inevitable chaos, and emerged successfully.

  1. Big Tech Escapees

Senior engineers, PMs, or operators from Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple who've decided to trade stability for equity upside and impact. They bring world-class practices but must adapt to resource-constrained startup environments.

Best when: They're genuinely excited about startups (not just chasing equity lottery) and willing to get hands-on.

  1. Consulting → Operator Transitions

Former consultants from McKinsey, Bain, BCG, or boutique strategy firms who've moved into operating roles. They bring strategic thinking and problem-solving frameworks, but must develop execution muscle.

Best when: They've done at least 2-3 years in an operating role, not fresh from consulting.

  1. Corporate Executives Who Want Impact

Operators from large companies (banks, manufacturers, retailers, traditional tech) who've led digital transformation or innovation initiatives and want to escape corporate bureaucracy.

Best when: They're truly embracing startup velocity, not bringing corporate playbooks that don't scale down.

  1. Cross-Border Hybrids

Executives who've built careers spanning both the U.S. and Mexico—often Mexican nationals educated in the U.S., who worked in tech hubs (SF, NYC, Austin), then returned. Or American executives who've worked extensively in Mexico.

These are rare and highly valuable for cross-border startups.

Compensation Dynamics: Mexico vs. U.S.

Executive compensation in startup markets sits in a complex middle ground:

Mexico Startup Executives:

CTO: $100K-$250K USD base + equity (0.5%-2% depending on stage)
CPO: $90K-$220K USD base + equity (0.3%-1.5%)
CFO: $110K-$240K USD base + equity (0.3%-1.5%)
Chief Revenue Officer: $100K-$230K USD base + equity (0.5%-2%)
CPO/CHRO: $90K-$200K USD base + equity (0.2%-1%)
Head of Growth/CMO: $90K-$210K USD base + equity (0.3%-1.5%)

U.S. Startup Executives (or cross-border roles based in the U.S.):

CTO: $180K-$350K USD base + equity
CPO: $160K-$320K USD base + equity
CFO: $170K-$340K USD base + equity
Chief Revenue Officer: $170K-$330K USD base + equity
CPO/CHRO: $150K-$300K USD base + equity
Head of Growth/CMO: $150K-$310K USD base + equity

Equity ranges vary by stage:

  • Seed/Series A: 1%-3% for C-suite
  • Series B: 0.5%-1.5%
  • Series C+: 0.1%-0.75%

Critical: Compensation is not just cash + equity

Top executives also evaluate:

  • Company trajectory (growth rate, funding, product-market fit)
  • Team quality (do they want to work with the CEO and other execs?)
  • Mission alignment (do they care about the problem?)
  • Learning opportunity (will this make them better?)
  • Competitive landscape (multiple offers simultaneously)

Your competitive advantage isn't always about the highest cash—it's about your mission, team, growth, and equity story.

CROSS-BORDER STARTUP LEADERSHIP: U.S.-MEXICO

Why Cross-Border Startups Need Bi-Cultural Leaders

Most startups scaling between the U.S. and Mexico make the same mistake: they hire for one market and assume the executive can figure out the other.

That rarely works.

Here's why bi-cultural, cross-border leadership matters:

  1. Regulatory and Legal Complexity

The U.S. and Mexico have completely different legal frameworks for employment, data privacy, corporate structure, taxation, and industry-specific regulations. An executive who's only operated in one market will face expensive learning curves.

  1. Talent Markets Operate Differently

Hiring engineers in Mexico City is different from San Francisco. Compensation expectations, retention dynamics, cultural norms around feedback/hierarchy, remote work—all different. Bicultural leaders can build effective teams in both markets.

  1. Customer Behavior and GTM Diverge

B2B sales cycles, enterprise customer expectations, payment preferences, trust-building mechanisms, and distribution channels are different between the U.S. and Mexico. Product-market fit in one market doesn't guarantee fit in the other.

  1. Investor Expectations Differ

U.S. VC and Mexican VC evaluate companies differently. Metrics that matter to Silicon Valley investors may differ from what ALLVP, FEMSA Ventures, or Jaguar Ventures prioritize.

  1. Cultural Intelligence, Not Just Language

Bilingual capability is table stakes. What matters more: understanding Mexican business culture (relationship-oriented, indirect communication, hierarchy-conscious) vs. U.S. business culture (transactional, direct, egalitarian).

The Ideal Cross-Border Startup Executive Profile:

✓ Has lived/worked in both the U.S. and Mexico (not just visited)
✓ Speaks English and Spanish with business fluency
✓ Has built products or teams that succeeded in both markets
✓ Maintains networks in both ecosystems
✓ Navigates cultural differences effortlessly
✓ Understands "how things get done" in each market

These executives are rare. Finding them requires networks in both markets.

THE STRATEGIC SEARCH PROCESS FOR STARTUP LEADERS

Startup executive search isn't posting on LinkedIn and waiting for applications. It's strategic headhunting informed by deep market intelligence.

Here's how I approach startup executive search:

Phase 1: Define the Stage-Specific Mandate

Before I talk to a single candidate, I need to understand:

Your actual stage: Seed? Series A? Series B? Each stage requires radically different executive profiles. I don't send you Series C operators when you need Series A builders.

Business model and go-to-market: B2B SaaS? Consumer app? Marketplace? Fintech? Each requires different domain expertise in your executives.

Cultural fit requirements: Fast-moving and scrappy? Data-driven and analytical? Mission-driven? Hierarchical or flat? There's no correct answer—but compatibility matters.

Founder dynamics: How involved will founders remain? What's the power dynamic? This determines what kind of executive will succeed.

Phase 2: Target Startup Ecosystems, Not Just Titles

Generic recruiters search LinkedIn for "CTO startup." I map startup ecosystems.

I know which Mexican startups are thriving (hard to poach) vs. struggling (potential availability). I know which U.S. startups have strong cultures worth targeting. I track funding rounds, acquisitions, and layoffs—signals of talent availability.

I target:

  • Specific companies where I know leaders with your required experience
  • Startup communities (YC alumni, Endeavor network, Platanus Ventures, 500 Startups portfolio)
  • Second-tier leaders at top startups ready for first C-suite role
  • Executives at stalled startups that are looking for better opportunities

This isn't spray-and-pray. It's precision targeting.

Phase 3: Assess for Startup-Specific Competencies

When I evaluate startup executives, I'm assessing:

Pattern recognition: Have they solved problems similar to yours before? Do they know what "good" looks like at your stage?

Adaptability: Can they thrive in ambiguity? Pivot when needed? Operate with incomplete information?

Hands-on capability: Will they roll up sleeves or just delegate? Early-stage needs doers, not just strategists.

Cultural fit: Will they embrace your culture or try to import corporate playbooks that don't work?

Cross-border capability: If relevant, can they actually operate in both the U.S. and Mexico markets?

I test these through case-based interviews, reference checks with people who've worked with them, and evaluating their track record in similar contexts.

Phase 4: Navigate Startup Compensation Complexity

Startup compensation requires nuanced negotiation:

Cash vs. equity trade-offs: Some candidates optimize for cash (families, risk-averse). Others want equity upside (already financially secure). I help you structure offers that align.

Equity education: Most executives don't understand their equity packages. I help them evaluate your offer—liquidation preferences, valuation, dilution, exit scenarios—so they make informed decisions.

Cross-border compensation: If hiring a U.S.-based executive for a Mexican company (or vice versa), how do you structure compensation fairly across two economies?

Phase 5: De-Risk Leadership Transitions

Startup leadership transitions are high-stakes. A failed CTO hire costs 12-18 months of opportunity.

I don't abandon you post-hire. I provide:

30-60-90-day onboarding frameworks tailored to startups
Stakeholder alignment (board, investors, team)
Integration support to help the new executive build relationships and gain trust.

The goal isn't just a successful hire—it's a successful first year.

FAQ - STARTUP & SCALE-UP EXECUTIVE SEARCH

1Q: How long does it take to fill a startup CTO or executive role?
Realistic timeline: 90-120 days for quality hire. Here's the breakdown: Weeks 1-2: Define mandate, build target list (60-100 potential candidates) Weeks 3-6: Outreach, initial conversations, narrow to 10-15 serious candidates Weeks 7-10: Deep assessment, client interviews, reference checks Weeks 10-12: Offer negotiation, acceptance, notice period coordination Can it go faster? Sometimes. If your company is hot (recent funding, strong traction, great team), and I already know the perfect candidate, we might close in 60 days. Can it take longer? Absolutely. If you're early-stage with limited capital, competing against well-funded competitors, or requiring a particular background (e.g., "Mexican national with U.S. experience who's scaled marketplace platforms and speaks Mandarin"), expect 150+ days. Red flag: Any recruiter promising a 30-day executive search either doesn't understand the market or will send mediocre candidates fast.
2Q: Should we hire executives from big tech or other startups?
Neither exclusively. You want startup veterans with the right stage experience. Big Tech Executives: Pros: World-class practices and operational sophistication Strong networks for recruiting Have seen "good" at scale Cons: Often can't operate with startup resource constraints Expect processes, budgets, and teams that don't exist yet May struggle with ambiguity and rapid change Best when: You're Series B+ and need to professionalize/scale operations. Startup Veterans: Pros: Thrive in ambiguity and chaos Comfortable with resource constraints Move fast, embrace experimentation Cons: May lack experience scaling past 100 people Sometimes, they might resist the process/discipline needed at the growth stage Best when: You're Seed to Series A and need scrappy builders. The sweet spot: Executives who've done both—started at startups, moved to big tech to learn world-class practices, then returned to startups to apply those lessons. Or executives who've scaled a startup from Series A through Series C+ and seen multiple stages. Critical: Match stage experience to your actual stage. Don't hire a Series C operator for a Series A company. Don't hire a seed-stage generalist for a Series B company that needs institutional builders.
3Q: What compensation structures work for startup executives?
It depends entirely on stage, capital position, and candidate risk tolerance. Early-Stage (Seed to Series A): Cash-constrained, equity-heavy. You're selling vision. Base: 60-75% of market rate Equity: 1.0%-3.0% for C-suite Pitch: "We can't pay Google money, but if we succeed, your equity is worth more than 10 years of a big company salary." Growth-Stage (Series B-C): More balanced. You've proven traction and have capital. Base: 80-100% of market rate Equity: 0.3%-1.5% for C-suite Pitch: "Competitive salary, meaningful equity, resources to build at scale." Late-Stage (Series C+ or profitable): Cash-competitive, equity still meaningful but less dilutive. Base: 100-120% of market rate Equity: 0.1%-0.75% for C-suite Pitch: "Top-of-market compensation, equity upside, established company with real traction." Cross-Border Complexity: If hiring a U.S.-based executive for a Mexican company, you'll likely pay closer to U.S. market rates. If hiring a Mexico-based executive for a U.S. company, don't underpay based purely on geography—top talent knows their value. The key: Match the compensation structure to the candidate's motivations. Some executives optimize for cash (risk-averse, families). Others optimize for equity (already financially secure, want wealth creation). Understand who you're hiring.
4Q: Do startup executives really need startup experience?
Yes—but the right kind of startup experience for your stage. What matters: Have they operated at your stage before? (Seed ≠ Series A ≠ Series B ≠ Series C) Have they built something from scratch in a similar context? Do they thrive in ambiguity or need structure? Can they operate with your resource constraints? What doesn't matter as much: Whether they have "startup" on their resume Whether they've worked at a famous startup How many startups they've been at Red flags: ✗ Only worked at late-stage, well-resourced startups (Uber in 2019 ≠ startup) ✗ Startup tourist (joins startups, leaves after 12 months repeatedly) ✗ Only worked at failed startups (pattern of poor judgment?) Green flags: ✓ Has scaled something—team, product, revenue—through multiple stages ✓ Pattern of increasing scope and responsibility ✓ Reference checks confirm they delivered, didn't just have an impressive title Exception: Sometimes the best hire is a big tech executive who's hungry to build, coachable, and genuinely excited about your mission—even without startup experience. Evaluate the person, not just the resume.
5Q: Can we find bilingual executives for U.S.-Mexico roles?
Yes—but bilingual capability is table stakes, not the differentiator. Most executives operating in cross-border roles speak English and Spanish with business fluency. The real question: do they have deep expertise in both markets? Three levels of bilingual capability: Level 1: Conversational Basic business conversations, struggles with technical/legal discussions. Not sufficient for senior leadership. Level 2: Business Fluent Participates in board meetings, negotiates contracts, and manages teams in both languages. Sufficient for most roles. Level 3: Native-Level Bilingual Grew up bilingual or spent significant time in both countries. Navigates cultural nuances effortlessly. Ideal but rare. What matters more than language: ✓ Cultural intelligence: Do they understand how business gets done in each market? ✓ Market expertise: Have they built products/teams that succeeded in both markets? ✓ Network depth: Do they have relationships in both ecosystems? Reality check: Finding a CTO who's technically brilliant, experienced at your stage, AND native-level bilingual is unicorn hunting. Prioritize the competencies that matter most, then build around gaps. If your exec is 90% there but weaker in Spanish, hire a bilingual Chief of Staff or ops leaders. If strong in Mexico but weaker in the U.S., build a U.S. advisory board. Don't let perfect be the enemy of excellent.
6Q: When should we hire a Head of Growth vs. a CMO?
Most early-stage startups get this wrong by hiring too senior too early. If you're Seed to Series A (< 100K users or < $5M ARR): Hire Head of Growth, not CMO. You need someone who: Runs experiments fast (test 10 channels, find two that work) Operates performance marketing hands-on (doesn't just manage agencies) Builds analytics infrastructure from scratch Optimizes conversion funnels directly Works scrappily with a limited budget Don't hire: A Strategic CMO who wants to "build the brand" before proving acquisition efficiency. You'll burn cash and gain little traction. If you're Series B+ (100K+ users or $5M+ ARR, $10M+ raised): Hire or elevate to CMO. You need someone who: Develops brand strategy and positioning Manages multi-channel integrated campaigns Builds and leads marketing team (5-20+ people) Thinks about market expansion, new product launches Interfaces with investors, board, and press The transition: Many startups hire a Head of Growth at Series A, then either promote the Head of Growth to CMO or hire a CMO and keep the Head of Growth as VP Performance Marketing. Exception: If you're in a hyper-competitive market where brand differentiation matters from day one (consumer fintech, crypto, DTC), consider CMO-level talent earlier—but ensure they can still operate tactically.
7Q: Should we hire a full C-suite early or wait?
Don't hire the full C-suite at Seed. Do hire strategically as you scale. Common Founder Mistake: Hiring executives too early (burning cash on overhead before you've proven traction) OR too late (organizational chaos because you waited too long). General Timing Guide: Seed (< $2M raised): Founders + builders. Don't hire executives yet. Series A ($2M-$10M): Hire 2-3 executives: typically CTO (if not founder), VP Sales or early CRO, Head of Growth or VP Marketing. Controller or VP Finance (not full CFO yet). Head of People (not yet a full CPO). Series B ($10M-$30M): Complete or nearly-complete C-suite. CFO (critical), Chief Revenue Officer, CPO (product), CPO/CHRO (people). CTO if not already hired. Series C+ ($30M+): Full executive team + specialized roles. The key insight: Hire each executive 6-9 months before you desperately need them. By the time you're drowning, you've already lost months of opportunity and accumulated organizational debt.

CONCLUSION

Mexico's startup ecosystem is at an inflection point. Record venture capital, ambitious founders, world-class technical talent, and unprecedented opportunity to build companies that scale across the U.S. and Latin American markets.

The companies that will win the next decade aren't necessarily those with the best initial ideas or the most funding—they're the ones with the best leadership teams.

Finding startup executives who can navigate this complexity—technology, growth, operations, finance, people, cross-border markets—requires specialized search expertise. It requires networks in both the U.S. and Mexican startup ecosystems. It requires the ability to assess not just what's on a resume, but whether a candidate can actually deliver in your specific context at your particular stage.

I've spent two decades building those networks, developing that assessment capability, and placing executives who've scaled startups from seed stage to market leadership.

Whether you're building fintech, SaaS, marketplace platforms, B2B infrastructure, consumer tech, or logistics technology—whether you're Seed, Series A, or Series C—the leadership challenges are fundamentally similar.

If you're ready to build an executive team that can actually scale your startup, not just fill positions with impressive titles—let's talk.

 

Ready to Build Your Startup Leadership Team?

Schedule a confidential assessment to discuss your executive search needs. We'll evaluate your stage-specific requirements, competitive positioning, and talent strategy—then map a plan to find leaders who can scale your business.

Trusted by Founders & VCs

Ready to Build an Executive Team That Actually Scales?

20+ years placing CTOs, CPOs, CFOs, and complete C-suite teams for startups from seed to Series C. Let's map your stage-specific hiring strategy.

Start the Conversation

✓ Confidential consultation    ✓ No obligation    ✓ Stage-specific insights