Leadership in Resource-Constrained Conditions: Brawn GP
March 6, 2026
Why Great Talent Fails: Organizational Execution Problems
March 11, 2026
VP Sales vs CRO vs CCO: Which Role Do You Need?
The board said they needed a CRO.
What they actually needed was a VP of Sales who could close enterprise deals.
The CRO they hired spent six months building a revenue operations infrastructure nobody was ready for. Pipeline stalled. Reps got frustrated. The board wondered why revenue hadn't accelerated.
Here's the pattern I keep seeing: companies hire titles for the company they want to be, not the one they actually are.
Titles scale faster than companies do.
The result is predictable: an expensive hire, a confused organization, and eighteen months before anyone names the mismatch.
Three Roles That Sound the Same and Aren't
The VP of Sales
The VP of Sales owns execution.
Pipeline. Quotas. Rep performance. Deal velocity. They live inside the sales floor rhythm: pipeline reviews, live deal coaching, territory adjustments.
Their horizon is simple: this quarter's number and the pipeline that supports the next one.
Most companies that say they need a CRO actually need this.
The Chief Revenue Officer
The CRO owns the revenue system.
Sales, marketing alignment, customer success, revenue operations. Their job isn't closing deals. It's designing the machine that consistently produces them.
A CRO thinks in systems: lead generation → qualification → conversion → expansion → retention.
Without authority over marketing and customer success, a CRO isn't a CRO. They're a VP of Sales with a bigger title.
The Chief Commercial Officer
The CCO owns commercial direction.
Markets. Pricing. Positioning. Partnerships. Where the CRO builds the revenue engine, the CCO decides where the company competes.
They shape what the company sells, to whom, at what price, and through which channels.
This role appears later in a company's evolution, when commercial strategy matters more than pipeline discipline.
Why the Confusion Persists
Title inflation. "VP of Sales" feels mid-level even when it's the right role. "CRO" feels executive. So the company hires a CRO when the scope is VP of Sales, and the executive arrives to discover their mandate is pipeline management with a prestigious title.
Borrowed playbooks. Companies copy org charts from companies they admire without assessing whether those structures match their conditions. A $500M SaaS company needs CRO integration. A $30M company needs execution.
Vendor influence. The revenue operations industry benefits from promoting the CRO model because CROs buy revenue operations tools. Neither vendors nor consultants are incentivized to tell a $40M company that what it actually needs is a VP of Sales who can hold 10 reps accountable.
The Mismatch Patterns
CRO Hired for VP of Sales Conditions
The company needs a sales leader. They hire a CRO.
The CRO builds dashboards, revenue operations workflows, and cross-functional alignment processes. Meanwhile, the 10 sales reps who actually generate revenue receive no coaching.
Pipeline stalls.
Nothing is technically wrong. The system just solved the wrong problem.
VP of Sales Hired Into CRO Conditions
The company's revenue problem is systemic: marketing generates leads that sales can't convert, customer churn erases new bookings, sales and product disagree on what the company actually sells.
The VP of Sales arrives and does what they know: pipeline reviews, rep coaching, and deal strategy. They're excellent at it. And none of it addresses the systemic problems.
The VP hits their bookings target while net revenue barely moves. They're performing their role perfectly. The scope just doesn't match what the company needs.
CCO Hired Into Either Set of Conditions
The rarest and most expensive mismatch. The company hires a CCO when they need someone to build a sales team or coordinate a revenue engine. The CCO, calibrated for market strategy, spends the first quarter doing competitive analysis while the pipeline stagnates.
The disconnect can last over a year before the board acknowledges the structural error.
The Diagnostic
The diagnostic is simpler than most boards think.
The symptom tells you the role.
If deals aren't closing → VP of Sales.
If deals close but revenue leaks across handoffs → CRO.
If the company is selling the wrong thing to the wrong market → CCO.
Before any commercial leadership search, I walk clients through two additional questions:
What authority will this person actually have? A CRO without authority over marketing and customer success is a VP of Sales with a bigger title. If the CEO isn't willing to give authority over the full revenue system, don't call the role CRO. You'll attract candidates calibrated for a scope you can't deliver.
What's the company's revenue stage? Pre-PMF companies rarely need anything beyond founder-led sales. $10M to $50M typically needs a VP of Sales. $50M to $200M with fragmented commercial functions may be ready for a CRO. Companies at scale with mature revenue engines may benefit from a CCO. The stage shapes the role.
The Cost of Getting It Wrong
Commercial leadership mismatches are expensive in a way most leadership mistakes aren't.
Sales momentum compounds. So does stagnation.
An eighteen-month cycle of hiring the wrong commercial leader, discovering the mismatch, managing the departure, searching again, and onboarding the replacement costs the company two years of commercial momentum. In a growth-stage company, two years of stagnation can be existential.
Beyond the direct cost, there's organizational damage. Sales teams that endure leadership turnover become skeptical of the next hire before the hire arrives. Reps who watched the last CRO build dashboards while deals stalled won't trust the next commercial leader's strategy offsite. The credibility deficit compounds with every mismatch.
The Pattern
Most companies don't hire the wrong commercial leader.
They hire the right leader for a role that doesn't exist.
The VP of Sales gets hired when the company needs a CRO. The CRO gets hired when the company needs a sales leader. The CCO gets hired when the company hasn't decided what it sells yet.
And eighteen months later, everyone concludes the executive failed.
Usually, the executive didn't fail. The role definition did.
Charlie Solórzano is a Managing Partner at Alder Koten, advising founders and boards on cross-border leadership transitions across the U.S. and Mexico.
Hiring Commercial Leadership?
A 30-minute conversation to diagnose which role your company actually needs — before the title creates eighteen months of mismatch.
Schedule a Confidential ConsultationFrequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between VP Sales vs CRO?
The VP of Sales owns execution — pipeline, quotas, rep performance, deal velocity. Their horizon is this quarter's number and the pipeline supporting the next one. The CRO owns the revenue system — sales, marketing alignment, customer success, revenue operations. They design the machine that consistently produces deals. Without authority over marketing and customer success, a CRO is just a VP of Sales with a bigger title.
What does a Chief Commercial Officer do?
The CCO owns commercial direction — markets, pricing, positioning, partnerships. Where the CRO builds the revenue engine, the CCO decides where the company competes. They shape what the company sells, to whom, at what price, through which channels. This role appears later in a company's evolution, when commercial strategy matters more than pipeline discipline.
How do I know which commercial role my company needs?
The symptom tells you the role. If deals aren't closing, you need a VP of Sales. If deals close but revenue leaks across handoffs, you need a CRO. If the company is selling the wrong thing to the wrong market, you need a CCO. Match the role to the problem, not the title to the aspiration.
Why do companies hire the wrong commercial leader?
Three forces: Title inflation — "CRO" feels executive while "VP of Sales" feels mid-level, even when VP is the right role. Borrowed playbooks — companies copy org charts from larger companies without assessing fit. Vendor influence — the revenue operations industry benefits from promoting the CRO model. Companies hire titles for who they want to be, not who they are.
What happens when you hire a CRO but need a VP of Sales?
The CRO builds dashboards, revenue operations workflows, and cross-functional alignment processes. Meanwhile the sales reps who actually produce revenue get no coaching. Pipeline stalls. Nothing is technically wrong — the system just solved the wrong problem. The executive didn't fail. The role definition did.
What's the cost of commercial leadership mismatch?
Eighteen months of drag: hiring the wrong leader, discovering the mismatch, managing departure, searching again, onboarding the replacement. Sales momentum compounds — so does stagnation. Beyond direct cost, sales teams that endure turnover become skeptical of the next hire. The credibility deficit compounds with every mismatch.
